Monday, January 23, 2012

NO FOOLIN': Watch Amazon VOD on the iPad

Special thanks to my co-worker Darren who shared an app with me today called iSwifter.  As an Amazon Prime member, I had been looking to play Amazon VOD titles on the iPad.  I'd tried some of the browsers that promised to play flash video, but wasn't able to get any of them to work.  So I downloaded the free version of iSwifter, signed in to Amazon VOD and hit the link for LOST--it worked like a charm.

iSwifter bills itself as an app for playing social media games on Facebook, Google+, etc.  But I think I've found the solution to my Amazon VOD dreams.

Now, fair warning, iSwifter only gives you 24 minutes of video for free, but with the $4.99 in app purchase you can get rid of the time limitation.

Enjoy!

- Hutch

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

How Amazon Followed Apple and Google Didn't

Amazon finally took the plunge today and went all in on the Apple model. Well, kind of.

You see Apple has been all about the ecosystem for the last decade. Their devices and computers each share enough of the same DNA now to make them feel somewhat similar, familiar. And if you really want to use them, you need to buy into the iTunes media world that they've created. Good, bad or ugly it doesn't matter. It's worked. And worked well. Like ol' Palmolive Madge used to say, "You're soaking in it."

But slowly, quietly, almost deftly Amazon has been building an ecosystem of its own. You probably didn't notice S3 or EC2, but you're using them more often than you know. You missed the fact that they had an MP3 store, until you realized how easy it was to save some coin on your music and that they're little iTunes importer actually worked (cross-platform too). Then came the streaming movies and TV shows. Okay in a pinch and sometimes cheaper than iTunes. Finally you figured, hey, why not join Amazon Prime, I'm ordering everything from Amazon anyway. And you were right, but then, what did they do, they GAVE you free streaming stuff. What? Free? What are these people thinking? And then you realized it. Another ecosystem. It was too late to stop once you noticed. They had you. You were using the Kindle device, or at least an app on your smart phone or iPad, or maybe even in the browser on your computer. And there it was, clear as day, you were living in another ecosystem.

And now comes the (at least currently) sad part of our story. Let me preface this by saying what a total Google fan-boy I am, but alas this tale of woe is true. Google just can't get a break. They're either late the game (e.g. Google+ [which I TOTALLY LOVE]) or they're way too early (e.g. Google Wave [which I TOTALLY miss]). Sure they'll store your music, and maybe even sell you some, but it's not really everywhere, accessible, easy. They have a bookstore, but it's B-grade at best. Google's still big and powerful and they're not out of the game yet. But let's be honest, isn't it just a bit sad to see how poorly the Google ecosystem works (or doesn't work) together? It is for me. I so desperately want Google Docs to be meaningful, but Dropbox bests it in almost every way. Wait! Do you hear it? There's a faint rustling coming from over there. Maybe it's G-drive. Maybe he can save us! Or maybe, just maybe, he'll create yet a third ecosystem that we'll all have to be a part of.

Stranger things have happened.

- Hutch

Thursday, August 04, 2011

From PCMAG: 'Shady RAT' Attacks Could Have Hit Thousands of Targets

McAfee: 'Shady RAT' Attacks Could Have Hit Thousands of Targets

  • binary hackers

    The McAfee researcher responsible for the company's report on the five-year "Shady RAT" attacks on high-profile U.S. government agencies, the United Nations, the IOC, and numerous defense contractors and IT companies believes that "thousands" more targets could have been attacked.

    In total, McAfee identified 72 major targets of the Shady RAT attacks, virtually all of which the company declined to identify.


So wait, are the victims or the perpetrators the rats in this story? I can't tell.

Wednesday, August 03, 2011

My Dog Wrote My Paper - From Schneier on Security: Identifying People by their Writing Style

It seems reasonable that we have a linguistic fingerprint, although 1) there are far fewer of them than finger fingerprints, 2) they're easier to fake. It's probably not much of a stretch to take that software that "identifies bundles of linguistic features, hundreds in all" and use the data to automatically modify my writing to look like someone else's.

Back in my day, there were those in college who might have someone write a paper for them--for a small fee, of course. Does this mean that now you could write one paper, run it through the "Writing Style Personalizer 3.5" software and pump out multiple versions? Think of the money you could...I mean, think of how wrong that would be.

Monday, August 01, 2011

PRIVACY [VIA LIFEHACKER.COM]: What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill (and How You Can Protect Yourself)

What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill (and How You Can Protect Yourself)On Thursday, the US House of Representatives approved an internet snooping bill that requires internet service providers (ISPs) to keep records of customer activity for a year so police can review them as needed. Here's what this bill means for you and what you can do about it.

What Is This Internet Snooping Bill, Exactly, and Why Is It Bad?

The lovingly titled Protecting Children From Internet Pornographers Act of 2011 (PCFIPA of 2011) requires ISPs to retain customer names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers, bank account numbers, and dynamic IP addresses. It's a record of your personal information plus the web sites you visit. It's like handing over a year's worth of browser history plus the contents of your wallet to the police. The thing is, you're not really handing it over so much as your ISP is—without your consent.

What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill (and How You Can Protect Yourself)You might be wondering what this has to do with child pornography and protecting children, as the bill claims to exist for those reasons. The idea is that child pornographers will be easier to catch if these records are available, and that, in turn, will protect children. According to the Denver Post, child pornography cases have been on the rise and there have been over 10,000 arrests since 1996. While the police should be prosecuting child pornographers and consumers, the problem isn't so out of control that these extreme measures are necessary.

Internet World Stats reports that there are currently 272.1 million Americans connected to the internet. The 10,000 known child pornography consumers make up a tiny fraction of a percent of Americans online. Even if the number of child pornography consumers were as much as 1,000,000, it still wouldn't make up a single percent. That's not to say that we wouldn't want to prosecute them and get them to stop, or that even 10,000 is a small number when it comes to a crime like this, but making a year's worth of records doesn't solve the problem.

What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill (and How You Can Protect Yourself)Consider the browser history of a single person over the course of a year, and then multiply that by 272,100,000. Then try to find 10,000 people in that data that have, at some point during that year, downloaded at least a single piece of child pornography. Finding a needle in a haystack is hard, but it gets to be pretty close to impossible when that haystack is the size of a country. There are too many people not downloading child porn to easily locate an offender and too few policemen to thoroughly look through the information. Like we've seen when the RIAA prosecuted music downloaders with little success, you get nowhere going after the consumers. Instead, you have to go after the providers. It's why police are much more interested in drug dealers than the people who buy from them. You need to cut off the source. But this bill isn't targeting the source at all. Furthermore, there are already provisions in place (like the Protect Our Children Act of 2008) that give the police a means of collecting information on a potential child pornography consumer.

Essentially, this bill does nothing more than make the browsing histories of approximately 272.1 million Americans readily available to the police. And that information comes with credit card numbers, addresses, and more. It not only encroaches upon personal privacy but is a complete waste of resources.

How You Can Block Snooping ISPs and Protect Your Privacy

What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill (and How You Can Protect Yourself)It could be worse. One nice feature of the PCFIPA of 2011 bill is that it doesn't include cellular data, so if you've thought about switching to 4G wireless data at home you'll soon have another reason. That's not an option for many people, however, but that doesn't mean you're out of luck.

Your best bet is to find yourself a good VPN provider and hook it up to a good VPN tool to encrypt and route all your internet traffic through a third-party that isn't your ISP. Virtual Private Networks creates secure, encrypted connections between your computer and a server on the internet, then routes all your internet activity through that server. Your ISP would only really be logging the IP address of your VPN server, which doesn't give them much of your private info.

What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill (and How You Can Protect Yourself)Tor is one of the easiest ways to browse anonymously online (even if it isn't perfect). If you're a Chrome user, you can even create a simple Tor toggle button to use it only when you really need it. By anonymizing your browsing, your ISPs won't have a record of what you've been doing. They'll know you were online, but the details won't be available to them or the police. Of course, there's no assurance that any anonymous browsing tool will provide full protection but it's definitely better than nothing at all. If setting up Tor seems a little daunting, Vidalia can help simplify the process. You'll also want to read our guide on protecting your privacy when downloading for more suggestions.

Got any suggestions of your own? Share your privacy-protecting strategies in the comments.


You can follow Adam Dachis, the author of this post, on Twitter, Google+, and Facebook.  Twitter's the best way to contact him, too.

Once again liberty and technology clash in an ethical battle. Can we not punish the guilty without constantly violating the liberty of the innocent? Oh, wait a minute, if I'm not doing anything wrong then I shouldn't have anything to hide, right? Wax your skis, my friends, here comes that slippery slope.

Sunday, July 31, 2011

VIA LIFEHACKER.COM: Top 10 Ways to Get the Most Out of Your Gear (Without Spending Extra Money)

Media_httpcachegawker_dsscf

Yes, you can do more with your gear. And, yes, it can be free or cheap. No, you're not dreaming.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Your ISP Is Screwing You: As Your Service Costs Go Up, Their Backbone Costs Go Down | TechCrunch

Basically, ISPs claim our data usage is going up and they must react. In reality, their costs are falling and this is a dodge, an effort to get us to pay more for services that were overpriced from day one.

Basically, they’re quietly raising our rates while pretending to prevent a tragedy of the commons.

Don't get me wrong, I fully support profit and free enterprise--we definitely don't want the government regulating our Internet--but isn't this where the free market, supply and demand is supposed to kick in? What's that you say? Collusion? Nooo, couldn't be.

Friday, July 22, 2011

YES, I AM TOO PICKY: @meckardt's Lion Bleacher saves iCal in Lion

Lionking
Ugly leather skin in iCal & Address Book? That's , that's . Get Lion Bleacher to restore them back to normal.

Actually, Lion Bleacher saves iCal and Address Book from the horrible faux leather skinning job that Apple gave them in Mac OS X Lion (10.7). Thank you @meckardt! Now Apple, should thank you.

- Hutch

Sunday, July 17, 2011

INTENDED CONSEQUENCES: Beligian Newspapers Claim Retaliation By Google After Copyright Victory

Beligian Newspapers Claim Retaliation By Google After Copyright Victory

Perhaps the lesson is: be careful what you sue for. The French and German-language Belgian newspaper consortium that successfully sued Google for copyright infringement got more than it bargained for this week.

The newspapers’ content has been removed not only from Google News (as desired) but the entire Google index. Now the newspapers are crying foul, saying that Google is “retaliating” against them for their legal victory.

 

 

via SearchEngineLand.com 

 

Ah, don't you just hate to see it when people get what they want/deserve.  No?  Me neither.  Idiots.